Corrupt Commissions, Crimes and Suspects.

By S.r. Dusty Rohde

© June, 2019

Fifty Six Years: Since the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy.

Fifty Six Years: Without a trial

Fifty Six Years: Without Justice

While investigating the bold, in your face, horrendous murder of John F. Kennedy, I’ve heard more nonsense, and more asinine claims, then I’d ever imagined possible. I’ve watched and listened as the media, researchers and loons trip over each other looking for the mythical “Smoking Gun”.  Yes, that big smoking gun expected to break the “whodunit” case wide open. Dripping with anticipation at each new release of withheld records, those smoking gun enthusiasts hopes are  repeatedly dashed. The “Lone Assassin” fans do a little victory dance, titter and giggle amongst themselves. The adage “ignorance is bliss” was never more true for the “Oswald did it” crowd. Why? Because the smoking gun or guns have been right in front of researchers for decades, but sit for the most part unseen and unrecognized. In this writing, I very much want to take a moment to open some eyes and plant a few seeds of insight. 

If you’re familiar at all with the murder of John F. Kennedy, then you likely know that the “fatal” shot was attributed to the head shot of JFK. If this was true, and evidence indicates that it was, then Lee Harvey Oswald is not, and was not guilty of killing this man. Why not? Simple….because the evidence shows quite clearly that the bullet(s) striking JFK’s head, did NOT originate from the Texas School Book Depository, the ballistics don’t match. If Lee Harvey Oswald was inside the Texas School Book Depository when the shots were fired, then he’s innocent. It is as simple as that. No one, in the TSBD killed John F. Kennedy. If you don’t “believe” that, check the physical evidence yourself. Any of you who work in forensics, ballistics or crime scene investigations will find the truth readily enough.

Right now, I’d like to tell you with total confidence, there is only one reason and only one, why this case was not solved over 50 years ago. That is because those involved have eluded a trial, in a court of law since the day this murder took place. This was no accident, evading a court of law was entirely of deliberate and criminal intent. In the process of evading this trial, many crimes were committed. Like Tax evasion, evading justice is not legal. There are legal terms for anyone helping criminals evade justice. One of those terms is called “aiding and abetting”, another is “accessory after the fact”. (Definitions per U.S. Law provided below)

Aiding and Abetting: 

“The elements necessary to convict under aiding and abetting theory are

1. That the accused had specific intent to facilitate the commission of a crime by another;

2. That the accused had the requisite intent of the underlying substantive offense;

3. That the accused assisted or participated in the commission of the underlying substantive offense; and

4. That someone committed the underlying offense.”

(https://www.justice.gov/jm/criminal-resource-manual-2474-elements-aiding-and-abetting)

Accessory after the fact: 

“Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.“

(https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3) 

While there were a number of laws broken in the process of falsely accusing Lee Harvey Oswald as the “Lone Assassin” of John F. Kennedy, this Law also needs mentioning. (See below)

Seditious Conspiracy: 

“If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.“ (Please pay particular attention to those words highlighted in red, shown above).

(https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384) 

Now you may be wondering at this point, what am I getting at? In 1865, Abraham Lincolns assassin and co-conspirators “trial” was by a Military Commission and not a court of law. (Military Commission members shown below)

This effort was immediately protested by none other than Lincoln’s former Attorney General Edward Bates who believed the Military Commission was “Unconstitutional“. This was then taken later to the Supreme Court where indeed a Military Commission presiding over this case was deemed unlawful under Constitutional Law. This was deemed “ursurpation” of Federal law and unlawful. In 1867, under “ex parte Milligan“, further steps were taken to clarify and ensure that this could never happen again. In short, a Military Commission may only preside over civilian cases when civilian courts are not functioning such as under Martial Law. What ex parte Milligan failed to address is that any and all Commission’s, military or civilian are unlawful “usurpation” of Constitutional law. So, what is “ursurpation” in this context? (See below)

“Ursurpation”: “The tyrannical assumption of the government by force contrary to and in violation of the constitution of the country.” 

This then brings us to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy and the “President’s Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy” created by the demands of Lyndon Baines Johnson. This commission is better known as “The Warren Commission”, so named after Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Earl Warren, who presided over the commission.  While this was not a military commission, it was once again a cleverly disguised “Ursurpation” of Constitutional law, or more specifically “Due Process“. (Warren Commission members shown below)

Under the legal pretense of this unlawful commission, the Federal government through assorted alphabet agencies “ursurped” control of the majority of evidence related to the assassination. 

The creation and initiation of the Warren Commission laid waste to “Due Process” and Civil Rights, a fact that Earl Warren, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court could hardly be ignorant of. In fact, it would be safe to say, every single attorney working with the Commission was aware of these unlawful acts. How could they not be? They were attorneys, required to study these laws as part of their core requirements for their college degrees. No, they can not claim “ignorance” of these Constitutional violations, not by a long shot.

I have seen individuals claim many times “neither side can prove their case”. The “sides” being fans of the “Lone Assassin” – Oswald did it theory and those researchers named “Conspiracy Theorists”. The claim that neither side can prove their case is absolute and utter nonsense. It is an out and out lie….made by the ignorant or dishonest. Put this case in a court of law and I promise you, this case will be solved.

Very recently, people asked for a new investigation of the murder of John F. Kennedy. I would like ask all of you to stop making this request. American citizens do not need another “unlawful” investigation or unlawful “Commission”. These commissions in the past, had NO legal standing or lawful authority! These commissions were nothing but smoke and mirrors, typical of “red herrings”. They were a very deliberate ursurpation of Constitutional law and Civil rights and they always will be. At best, these commissions are worthless as far as achieving justice, understand that. At worst, they were corruption with a capital “C”. If you truly feel a new, honest investigation is required, I ask all of you, from this day forward, to demand a “Trial” in the case of John F. Kennedy, in a court of law!

Why is an actual “Trial” important? This should be obvious, but simply put, in a court of law no evidence may be withheld! None! Not one shred of evidence may be withheld from defense attorney’s, witnesses may not be silenced by non-disclosure. The Federal gov’t can not use the guise of “National Security” for withholding evidence. More importantly, the Federal government never had the right to take possession of said evidence. 

Lee Harvey Oswald was murdered before he had an opportunity to meet with a defense lawyer. Lee Harvey Oswald was the only person who was denied a defense attorney under the “unlawful” Warren Commission. Jack Ruby stated he murdered Oswald to block a trial but he was far from alone in this effort. My friend and fellow student of the JFK assassination Doug Campbell has often said, “The cover-up is the conspiracy”. 

I have heard several “Warren Commission-Warren Apologists” claim they’ve studied the JFK assassination for 30, 40 or 50 years…and Oswald did it. First of all….that statement is libel and defamation of character, both are illegal. I haven’t researched the assassination for 30-50 years. I’ve studied the evidence very hard for just under 8 years. From what I’ve found in the process of examination, I can state the following. 

The individuals and/or agencies found to have committed unlawful acts or took part in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy are as follows. (Note this is not a complete list)

Lyndon Baines Johnson: (former President of the USA) 

1. Seditious Conspiracy.
2. Obstruction of Justice
3. Coercion
4. Collusion
5. Aiding and Abetting
6. Ursurpation of the Office of President

J. Edgar Hoover (and FBI): (former Director of the FBI, USA) 

1. Seditious Conspiracy
2. Collusion
3. Obstruction of Justice
4. Aiding and Abetting
5. Witness Tampering
6. Evidence Tampering
7. Destruction of Evidence
8. Withholding Evidence
9. Perjured Testimonies

Earl Warren: Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

1. Aiding and Abetting
2. Obstruction of Justice

Dr. James J. Humes: Chief Pathologist, Bethesda, Maryland (Autopsy Surgeon)              Dr. Thorton J. Boswell: (Autopsy Surgeon, Bethesda, Maryland)                                          Dr. Pierre Finck: (Autopsy Surgeon, Bethesda, Maryland)

1. Perjury (multiple counts)
2. Fraud
3. Conspiracy to commit Fraud
4. Evidence tampering
5. Withholding Evidence
6. Accessories After the Fact
7. Aiding and Abetting

Arlen Specter: Attorney and Warren Commission Chief Investigator

1. Fraud
2. Withholding Evidence
3. Collusion
4. Aiding and Abetting
5. Accessory After the Fact

Ida Dox: Medical Illustrator, House Select Committee on Assassination.

1. Fraud
2. Perjury
3. Aiding and Abetting
4. Accessory After the Fact

Roscoe Anthony White: (former Dallas Police Patrolman)

1. Prime Suspect, Murder in the First degree, (President John F. Kennedy)
2. Seditious Conspiracy
3. Aiding and Abetting, (in the murder of JD Tippit, former Dallas Police Patrolman)

Jack Lawrence: (Employee, Downtown Lincoln-Mercury car dealership, Dallas, Tx.)

1. Prime Suspect, Murder in the First Degree, (President John F. Kennedy)
2. Prime Suspect, Murder in the First Degree, (Dallas Police Patrolman, JD Tippit)
3. Perjury

This is just the beginning of the list of agencies and individuals involved in criminal acts related to JFK’s assassination, more will be added. For a brief overview of events that actually did take place in Dealey Plaza I make the following statement. 

1. There were a total of six shots fired at the President’s limo, 5 of which hit living targets.
2. There were 3 shooters, each shooter fired two shots each. 
3. Shooters were located at the “Grassy Knoll”, the Texas School Book Depository (sixth floor) and the Dal-Tex building (second floor).
4. Grassy Knoll shooter fired the 1st and last shots (throat shot to JFK and the Z313 head shot to JFK).
5. TSBD shooter fired the 2nd and 3rd shots, hitting both JFK and John Connally in the back with separate shots.
6. The Dal-Tex shooter fired the 4th and 5th shots, one striking JFK in the head (the windshield and curb), the other striking the chrome strip at the top of the windshield.

(To be continued)……